Maarten Balliauw {blog}

ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC, Windows Azure, PHP, ...


Just released: MvcSiteMapProvider 4.0

MvcSiteMapProviderAfter a beta version about a month ago, we are proud to release MvcSiteMapProvider 4.0 stable! (get it from NuGet, it’s fresh!) It took 6 months to complete this major version but I think our GitHub contributors have done a great job. Thank you all and especially Shad for taking the lead on this release!

MvcSiteMapProvider is a tool targeted at ASP.NET MVC that provides menus, site maps, site map path functionality, and more. It provides the ability to configure a hierarchical navigation structure using a pluggable architecture that can be XML, database, or code driven. We have moved beyond a mere ASP.NET SiteMapProvider implementation to provide support for multi-tenant applications, flexible caching, dependency injection, and several interface-based extensibility points where virtually any part of the provider can be replaced with a custom implementation.

Based on areas, controller and action method names rather than hardcoded URL references, sitemap nodes are completely dynamic based on the routing engine used in an application. Search Engine Optimization support is also provided in the form of dynamic sitemaps XML, canonical URL tags, and meta robots tags to ensure you send the search engines consistent - rather than conflicting - information about your URLs.

What has changed?

What I originally intended to do in v2 (but decided against based on popular request) is something that now has been done. The biggest change in this release is that we have stepped away from being an ASP.NET SiteMapProvider implementation. This means a lot of code had to be rewritten making v4 a pretty clean release. We’re not there yet completely as we want to have unit tests for all (and some more changes will be required for that).

Next to stepping away from the ASP.NET provider model, we’ve improved support for dependency injection. If you don’t need it, no worries. If you do need it: every component of the MvcSiteMapProvider is now pluggable. A simple IoC container is used inside MvcSiteMapProvider but you can easily use your preferred one. We’ve created several NuGet packages for popular containers: Ninject, StructureMap, Unity, Autofac and Windsor. Note that we also have packages with the modules only so you can keep using your own container setup. Read more in the documentation.

The sitemap building pipeline has changed as well. A collection of sitemap builders is used to build the sitemap hierarchy from one or more sources. The default configuration of sitemap builders include an XML parser builder, a reflection-based builder, and a builder that implements the visitor pattern which is used to resolve the URLs before they are cached. Both the builders and visitors can be replaced with 1 or more custom implementations, opening up the door to alternate data sources and alternate visitor actions. In other words, you can build the tree any way you see fit. The only limitation is that only one of the builders must decide which node is the root node of the tree (although subsequent builders may change that decision, if needed).

The Menu() helper has been rewritten to become a more performant and reliable helper (thanks for the contribution, midishero!)

A great bunch of performance enhancements and stability fixes are in as well.

How do I upgrade?

Since MvcSiteMapProvider has had some significant updates going from v3 to v4, it is best to read the upgrade guide. The first part of the upgrade from v3 to v4 will be updating the NuGet package. Before, MvcSiteMapProvider only had one NuGet package. Today, it has been split in multiple, of which the following ones are good to know at this time:

  • MvcSiteMapProvider.Web containing all views and web.config changes
  • MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC<version>.Core containing the library itself

Upgrading from v3 to v4 consists of installing the correct packages for your ASP.NET MVC version:

  • For MVC 2, uninstall MvcSiteMapProvider and install MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC2
  • For MVC 3, uninstall MvcSiteMapProvider and install MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC3
  • For MVC 4, uninstall MvcSiteMapProvider and install MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC4
  • Note that for MVC 4 we have made it possible to upgrade MvcSiteMapProvider instead, which will pull in all required dependencies. Do know that this is not the recommended scenario and it is preferred to install MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC4 instead.

The MvcSiteMapProvider.Web update will add views and all required runtime dependencies to your project. This package is a dependency of each of the above options and generally will not need to be installed explicitly.

In .NET versions prior to .NET 4.0, one line of code should be added to the Application_Start() event of Global.asax:


Note that this code is automatically executed if using .NET 4.0 or higher by the use of WebActivator, so in most cases you will not need to call it manually.

More? Please read the upgrade guide.

What’s next?

NuGet all the things! Install the new MvcSiteMapProvider.MVCx package (replace X with your ASP.NET MVC version) and try it out! Leave your comments, ideas and pull requests on our GitHub page.


Windows Azure Traffic Manager Explained

imageWith yesterday’s announcement on Windows Azure Traffic Manager surfacing in the management portal (as a preview), I thought it was a good moment to recap this more than 2 year old service. Windows Azure Traffic Manager allows you to control the distribution of network traffic to your Cloud Services and VMs hosted within Windows Azure.



What is Traffic Manager?

The Windows Azure Traffic Manager provides several methods of distributing internet traffic among two or more cloud services or VMs, all accessible with the same URL, in one or more Windows Azure datacenters. At its core, it is basically a distributed DNS service that knows which Windows Azure services are sitting behind the traffic manager URL and distributes requests based on three possible profiles:

  • Failover: all traffic is mapped to one Windows Azure service, unless it fails. It then directs all traffic to the failover Windows Azure service.
  • Performance: all traffic is mapped to the Windows Azure service “closest” (in routing terms) to the client requesting it. This will direct users from the US to one of the US datacenters, European users will probably end up in one of the European datacenters and Asian users, well, somewhere in the Asian datacenters.
  • Round-robin: Just distribute requests between various Windows Azure services defined in the Traffic Manager policy

Now I’ve started this post with the slightly bitchy tone that “this service has been around for over two years”. And that’s true! It has been in the old management portal for ages and hasn’t since left the preview stage. However don’t think nothing happened with this service: next to using Traffic Manager for cloud services, we now can also use it for distributing traffic across VM’s. Next to distributing traffic over datacenters for cloud services, we can now do this for VMs as well. What about a SharePoint farm deployed in multiple datacenters, using Traffic Manager to distribute traffic geographically?

Why should I care?

We’ve seen it before: clouds being down. Amazon EC2, Google, Windows Azure, … They all have had their glitches. With any cloud going down, whether completely or partially, it seems a lot of websites “in the cloud” are down at that time. Most comments you read on Twitter at those times are along the lines of “outrageous!” and “don’t go cloud!”. While I understand these comments, I think they are wrong. These “clouds” can fail. They are even designed to fail, and often provide components and services that allow you to cope with these failures. You just have to expect failure at some point in time and build it into your application.

Yes, I just told you to expect failure when going to the cloud. But don’t consider a failing cloud a bad cloud or a cloud that is down. For your application, a “failing” cloud or server or database should be nothing more than a scaling operation. The only thing is: it’s scaling down to zero. If you design your application so that it can scale out, you should also plan for scaling “in”, eventually to zero. Use different availability zones on Amazon, and if you’re a Windows Azure user you are protected by fault domains within the datacenter, and Traffic Manager can save your behind cross-datacenter. Use it!


My thoughts on Traffic Manager

Let’s come back to that “2 year old service”. Don’t let that or the fact that is “is still a preview” hold you back from using Traffic Manager. Our MyGet web application is making use of it since it was first introduced. While in the beginning we used it for performance reasons (routing US traffic to a US datacenter and EU traffic to a EU datacenter), we’ve changed the strategy and are now using it as a failover to the North Europe datacenter in which nothing is deployed. The screenshot below highlights a degradation (because there indeed is no deployment in Europe North, currently).

MyGet Windows Azure Traffic Manager

But why failover to a datacenter in which no deployments are done? Well, because if West Europe datacenter would fail, we can simply spin up a new deployment in North Europe. Yes, there will be some downtime, but the last thing we want to have in such situation is downtime from DNS propagation taking too long. Now we simply map to our Traffic Manager domain and whenever we need to switch, Traffic Manager takes care of the DNS part.

In general, Traffic Manager has probably been the most stable service in the Windows Azure platform. I haven’t experienced any issues so far with Traffic Manager over more than two years, preview mode or not.


Update: Alexandre Brisebois, a colleague MVP, has some additional insights to share.

Autoscaling Windows Azure Cloud Services (and web sites)

At the Build conference, Microsoft today announced that Windows Azure Cloud Services now support autoscaling. And they do! From the Windows Azure Management Portal, we can use the newly introduced SCALE tab to configure autoscaling. That’s right: some configuration and we can select the range of instances we want to have. Windows Azure does the rest. And this is true for both Cloud Services and Standard Web Sites (formerly known as Reserved instances).

Automatic scaling Windows Azure

We can add various rules in the autoscaler:

  • The trigger for scaling: do we want to base scaling decisions on CPU usage or on the length of a given queue?
  • The scale up and scale down rules: do we scale by one instance or add / remove 5 at a time?
  • The interval: how long do we want to not touch the number of instances running after the previous scale operation?
  • The range: what’s the minimum and maximum required instances we want to have running?

Automatically increase instances under load

A long awaited feature is there! I'll enable this for some services and see how it goes...

And there it is - MvcSiteMapProvider v4 (beta)

imageIt has been a while since a new major update has been done to the MvcSiteMapProvider project, but today is the day! MvcSiteMapProvider is a tool that provides flexible menus, breadcrumb trails, and SEO features for the ASP.NET MVC framework, similar to the ASP.NET SiteMapProvider model.

To be honest, I have not done a lot of work. Thanks to the power of open source (and Shad who did a massive job on refactoring the whole, thanks!), MvcSiteMapProvider v4 is around the corner.

A lot of things have changed. And by a lot, I mean A LOT! The most important change is that we’ve stepped away from the ASP.NET SiteMapProvider dependency. This has been a massive pain in the behind and source of a lot of issues. Whereas I initially planned on ditching this dependency with v3, it happened now anyway.

imageOther improvements have been done around dependency injection: every component in the MvcSiteMapProvider can now be replaced with custom implementations. A simple IoC container is used inside MvcSiteMapProvider but you can easily use your preferred one. We’ve created several NuGet packages for popular containers: Ninject, StructureMap, Unity, Autofac and Windsor. Note that we also have packages with the modules only so you can keep using your own container setup.

The sitemap building pipeline has changed as well. A collection of sitemap builders is used to build the sitemap hierarchy from one or more sources. The default configuration of sitemap builders include an XML parser builder, a reflection-based builder, and a builder that implements the visitor pattern which is used to resolve the URLs before they are cached. Both the builders and visitors can be replaced with 1 or more custom implementations, opening up the door to alternate data sources and alternate visitor actions. In other words, you can build the tree any way you see fit. The only limitation is that only one of the builders must decide which node is the root node of the tree (although subsequent builders may change that decision, if needed).

Next to that, a series of new helpers have been added, bugs have been fixed, the security model has been made more performant and lots more. Consider v4 as almost a rewrite for the entire project!

We’ve tried to make the upgrade path as smooth as possible but there may be some breaking changes in the provider. If you currently have the ASP.NET MVC SiteMapProvider installed in your project, feel free to give the new version a try using the NuGet package of your choice (only one is needed for your ASP.NET MVC version).

Install-Package MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC2 -Pre
Install-Package MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC3 -Pre
Install-Package MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC4 -Pre

Speaking of NuGet packages: by popular demand, the core of MvcSIteMapProvider has been extracted into a separate package (MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC<version>.Core) so that you don’t have to include views and so on in your library projects.

Please give the beta a try and let us know your thoughts on GitHub (or the comments below). Pull requests currently go in the v4 branch.

Create a list of favorite ReSharper plugins

With the latest version of the ReSharper 8 EAP, JetBrains shipped an extension manager for plugins, annotations and settings. Where it previously was a hassle and a suboptimal experience to install plugins into ReSharper, it’s really easy to do now. And what is really nice is that this extension manager is built on top of NuGet! Which means we can do all sorts of tricks…

The first thing that comes to mind is creating a personal NuGet feed containing just those plugins that are of interest to me. And where better to create such feed than MyGet? Create a new feed, navigate to the Package Sources pane and add a new package source. There’s a preset available for using the ReSharper extension gallery!

Add package source on MyGet - R# plugins

After adding the ReSharper extension gallery as a package source, we can start adding our favorite plugins, annotations and extensions to our own feed.

Add ReSharper plugins to MyGet

Of course there are some other things we can do as well:

  • “Proxy” the plugins from the ReSharper extension gallery and post your project/team/organization specific plugins, annotations and settings to your private feed. Check this post for more information.
  • Push prerelease versions of your own plugins, annotations and settings to a MyGet feed. Once stable, push them “upstream” to the ReSharper extension gallery.


Using Amazon Login (and LinkedIn and …) with Windows Azure Access Control

One of the services provided by the Windows Azure cloud computing platform is the Windows Azure Access Control Service (ACS). It is a service that provides federated authentication and rules-driven, claims-based authorization. It has some social providers like Microsoft Account, Google Account, Yahoo! and Facebook. But what about the other social identity providers out there? For example the newly introduced Login with Amazon, or LinkedIn? As they are OAuth2 implementations they don’t really fit into ACS.

Meet It’s a service I created which does a protocol conversion and allows integrating ACS with other social identities. Currently it has support for integrating ACS with Twitter, GitHub, LinkedIn, BitBucket, StackExchange and Amazon. Let’s see how this works. There are 2 steps we have to take:

  • Link SocialSTS with the social identity provider
  • Link our ACS namespace with SocialSTS

Link SocialSTS with the social identity provider

Once an account has been created through, we are presented with a dashboard in which we can configure the social identities. Most of them require that you register your application with them and in turn, you will receive some identifiers which will allow integration.

SocialSTS - Register social identity provider

As you can see, instructions for registering with the social identity provider are listed on the configuration page. For Amazon, we have to register an application with Amazon and configure the following:

If we do this, Amazon will give us a client ID and client secret in return, which we can enter in the SocialSTS dashboard.

Amazon Login with Access Control on Windows Azure

That’s basically all configuration there is to it. We can now add our Amazon, LinkedIn, Twitter or GitHub login page to Windows Azure Access Control Service!

Link our ACS namespace with SocialSTS

In the Windows Azure Access Control Service management dashboard, we can register SocialSTS as an identity provider. SocialSTS will provide us with a FederationMetadata.xml URL which we can copy into ACS:

Add LinkedIn to ACS

We can now save this new identity provider, add some claims transformation rules through the rule groups (important!) and then start using it in our application:

Windows Identity Foundation claims from Amazon,LinkedIn and so on

Enjoy! And let me know your thoughts on this service.

Throttling ASP.NET Web API calls

Many API’s out there, such as GitHub’s API, have a concept called “rate limiting” or “throttling” in place. Rate limiting is used to prevent clients from issuing too many requests over a short amount of time to your API. For example, we can limit anonymous API clients to a maximum of 60 requests per hour whereas we can allow more requests to authenticated clients. But how can we implement this?

Intercepting API calls to enforce throttling

Just like ASP.NET MVC, ASP.NET Web API allows us to write action filters. An action filter is an attribute that you can apply to a controller action, an entire controller and even to all controllers in a project. The attribute modifies the way in which the action is executed by intercepting calls to it. Sound like a great approach, right?

Well… yes! Implementing throttling as an action filter would make sense, although in my opinion it has some disadvantages:

  • We have to implement it as an IAuthorizationFilter to make sure it hooks into the pipeline before most other action filters. This feels kind of dirty but it would do the trick as throttling is some sort of “authorization” to make a number of requests to the API.
  • It gets executed quite late in the overall ASP.NET Web API pipeline. While not a big problem, perhaps we want to skip executing certain portions of code whenever throttling occurs.

So while it makes sense to implement throttling as an action filter, I would prefer plugging it earlier in the pipeline. Luckily for us, ASP.NET Web API also provides the concept of message handlers. They accept an HTTP request and return an HTTP response and plug into the pipeline quite early. Here’s a sample throttling message handler:

1 public class ThrottlingHandler 2 : DelegatingHandler 3 { 4 protected override Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken) 5 { 6 var identifier = request.GetClientIpAddress(); 7 8 long currentRequests = 1; 9 long maxRequestsPerHour = 60; 10 11 if (HttpContext.Current.Cache[string.Format("throttling_{0}", identifier)] != null) 12 { 13 currentRequests = (long)System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache[string.Format("throttling_{0}", identifier)] + 1; 14 HttpContext.Current.Cache[string.Format("throttling_{0}", identifier)] = currentRequests; 15 } 16 else 17 { 18 HttpContext.Current.Cache.Add(string.Format("throttling_{0}", identifier), currentRequests, 19 null, Cache.NoAbsoluteExpiration, TimeSpan.FromHours(1), 20 CacheItemPriority.Low, null); 21 } 22 23 Task<HttpResponseMessage> response = null; 24 if (currentRequests > maxRequestsPerHour) 25 { 26 response = CreateResponse(request, HttpStatusCode.Conflict, "You are being throttled."); 27 } 28 else 29 { 30 response = base.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken); 31 } 32 33 return response; 34 } 35 36 protected Task<HttpResponseMessage> CreateResponse(HttpRequestMessage request, HttpStatusCode statusCode, string message) 37 { 38 var tsc = new TaskCompletionSource<HttpResponseMessage>(); 39 var response = request.CreateResponse(statusCode); 40 response.ReasonPhrase = message; 41 response.Content = new StringContent(message); 42 tsc.SetResult(response); 43 return tsc.Task; 44 } 45 }

We have to register it as well, which we can do when our application starts:

1 config.MessageHandlers.Add(new ThrottlingHandler());

The throttling handler above isn’t ideal. It’s not very extensible nor does it allow scaling out on a web farm. And it’s bound to being hosted in ASP.NET on IIS. It’s bad! Since there’s already a great project called WebApiContrib, I decided to contribute a better throttling handler to it.

Using the WebApiContrib ThrottlingHandler

The easiest way of using the ThrottlingHandler is by registering it using simple parameters like the following, which throttles every user at 60 requests per hour:

1 config.MessageHandlers.Add(new ThrottlingHandler( 2 new InMemoryThrottleStore(), 3 id => 60, 4 TimeSpan.FromHours(1)));

The IThrottleStore interface stores id + current number of requests. There’s only an in-memory store available but you can easily extend it to write this in a distributed cache or a database.

What’s interesting is we can change how our ThrottlingHandler behaves quite easily. Let’s give a specific IP address a better rate limit:

1 config.MessageHandlers.Add(new ThrottlingHandler( 2 new InMemoryThrottleStore(), 3 id => 4 { 5 if (id == "") 6 { 7 return 5000; 8 } 9 return 60; 10 }, 11 TimeSpan.FromHours(1)));

Wait… Are you telling me this is all IP based? Well yes, by default. But overriding the ThrottlingHandler allows you to do funky things! Here’s a wireframe:

1 public class MyThrottlingHandler : ThrottlingHandler 2 { 3 // ... 4 5 protected override string GetUserIdentifier(HttpRequestMessage request) 6 { 7 // your user id generation logic here 8 } 9 }

By implementing the GetUserIdentifier method, we can for example return an IP address for unauthenticated users and their username for authenticated users. We can then decide on the throttling quota based on username.

Once using it, the ThrottlingHandler will inject two HTTP headers in every response, informing the client about the rate limit:


Enjoy! And do checkout WebApiContrib, it contains almost all extensions to ASP.NET Web API you will ever need!

SymbolSource support for NuGet Package Source Discovery

A couple of weeks, I told you about NuGet Package Source Discovery. In short, it allows you to add some meta information to your website and use your website as a discovery document for NuGet feeds. And thanks to a contribution to the spec by Marcin from, Package Source Discovery (PSD) now supports configuring Visual Studio for consuming symbols as well. Nifty!

An example

Let’s go with an example. If we discover packages from my blog, some feeds will be added to NuGet in Visual Studio.

1 Install-Package DiscoverPackageSources 2 Discover-PackageSources -Url ""

Because my blog links to my feeds on MyGet, I can provide my MyGet credentials with it:

1 Install-Package DiscoverPackageSources 2 Discover-PackageSources -Url "" -Username maarten -Password s3cr3t

Note I’ve stripped out some of the secrets in the examples but I’m sure you get the idea.

What’s interesting is that because I provided credentials, MyGet also returned the SymbolSource URL for my feeds and it registered them automatically in Visual Studio.

Symbol server

Now that’s what I call being lazy in a professional manner!

On a side note… NuGet Feed Discovery

While not completely related to SymbolSource support, it’s worth mentioning that Package Source Discovery also got support for that other NuGet discovery protocol by the guys at Inedo, NuGet Feed Discovery (NFD). NFD differs from PSD in that both specs have a different intent.

  • NFD is a convention-based API endpoint for listing feeds on a server
  • PSD is a means of discovering feeds from any URL given

The fun thing is: if you add an NFD url to your web site’s metadata, it will also be added into Visual Studio by using NuGet Package Source Discovery. For reference, here’s an example where I add my local NuGet feeds to my blog for discovery:

1 <link rel="nuget" 2 type="application/atom+xml" 3 title="Local feeds" 4 href="http://localhost:8888/nugetext/discover-feeds" />


Running unit tests when deploying ASP.NET to Windows Azure Web Sites

Deployment failedOne of the well-loved features of Windows Azure Web Sites is the fact that you can simply push our ASP.NET application’s source code to the platform using Git (or TFS or DropBox) and that sources are compiled and deployed on your Windows Azure Web Site. If you’ve checked the management portal earlier, you may have noticed that a number of deployment steps are executed: the deployment process searches for the project file to compile, compiles it, copies the build artifacts to the web root and has your website running. But did you know you can customize this process?

[update] Mstest seems to work now as well, using the console runner from VS2012.

Customizing the build process

To get an understanding of how to customize the build process, I want to explain you how this works. In the root of your repository, you can add a .deployment file, containing a simple directive: which command should be run upon deployment.

1 [config] 2 command = build.bat

This command can be a batch file, a PHP file, a bash file and so on. As long as we can tell Windows Azure Web Sites what to execute. Let’s go with a batch file.

1 @echo off 2 echo This is a custom deployment script, yay!

When pushing this to Windows Azure Web Sites, here’s what you’ll see:

Windows Azure Web Sites custom build

In this batch file, we can use some environment variables to further customize the script:

  • DEPLOYMENT_SOURCE - The initial "working directory"
  • DEPLOYMENT_TARGET - The wwwroot path (deployment destination)
  • DEPLOYMENT_TEMP - Path to a temporary directory (removed after the deployment)
  • MSBUILD_PATH - Path to msbuild

After compiling, you can simply xcopy our application to the %DEPLOYMENT_TARGET% variable and have your website live.

Generating deployment scripts

Creating deployment scripts can be a tedious job, good thing that the azure-cli tools are there! Once those are installed, simply invoke the following command and have both the .deployment file as well as a batch or bash file generated:

1 azure site deploymentscript --aspWAP "path\to\project.csproj"

For reference, here’s what is generated:

1 @echo off 2 3 :: ---------------------- 4 :: KUDU Deployment Script 5 :: ---------------------- 6 7 :: Prerequisites 8 :: ------------- 9 10 :: Verify node.js installed 11 where node 2>nul >nul 12 IF %ERRORLEVEL% NEQ 0 ( 13 echo Missing node.js executable, please install node.js, if already installed make sure it can be reached from current environment. 14 goto error 15 ) 16 17 :: Setup 18 :: ----- 19 20 setlocal enabledelayedexpansion 21 22 SET ARTIFACTS=%~dp0%artifacts 23 24 IF NOT DEFINED DEPLOYMENT_SOURCE ( 25 SET DEPLOYMENT_SOURCE=%~dp0%. 26 ) 27 28 IF NOT DEFINED DEPLOYMENT_TARGET ( 29 SET DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=%ARTIFACTS%\wwwroot 30 ) 31 32 IF NOT DEFINED NEXT_MANIFEST_PATH ( 33 SET NEXT_MANIFEST_PATH=%ARTIFACTS%\manifest 34 35 IF NOT DEFINED PREVIOUS_MANIFEST_PATH ( 36 SET PREVIOUS_MANIFEST_PATH=%ARTIFACTS%\manifest 37 ) 38 ) 39 40 IF NOT DEFINED KUDU_SYNC_COMMAND ( 41 :: Install kudu sync 42 echo Installing Kudu Sync 43 call npm install kudusync -g --silent 44 IF !ERRORLEVEL! NEQ 0 goto error 45 46 :: Locally just running "kuduSync" would also work 47 SET KUDU_SYNC_COMMAND=node "%appdata%\npm\node_modules\kuduSync\bin\kuduSync" 48 ) 49 IF NOT DEFINED DEPLOYMENT_TEMP ( 50 SET DEPLOYMENT_TEMP=%temp%\___deployTemp%random% 51 SET CLEAN_LOCAL_DEPLOYMENT_TEMP=true 52 ) 53 54 IF DEFINED CLEAN_LOCAL_DEPLOYMENT_TEMP ( 55 IF EXIST "%DEPLOYMENT_TEMP%" rd /s /q "%DEPLOYMENT_TEMP%" 56 mkdir "%DEPLOYMENT_TEMP%" 57 ) 58 59 IF NOT DEFINED MSBUILD_PATH ( 60 SET MSBUILD_PATH=%WINDIR%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\msbuild.exe 61 ) 62 63 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 64 :: Deployment 65 :: ---------- 66 67 echo Handling .NET Web Application deployment. 68 69 :: 1. Build to the temporary path 70 %MSBUILD_PATH% "%DEPLOYMENT_SOURCE%\path.csproj" /nologo /verbosity:m /t:pipelinePreDeployCopyAllFilesToOneFolder /p:_PackageTempDir="%DEPLOYMENT_TEMP%";AutoParameterizationWebConfigConnectionStrings=false;Configuration=Release 71 IF !ERRORLEVEL! NEQ 0 goto error 72 73 :: 2. KuduSync 74 echo Kudu Sync from "%DEPLOYMENT_TEMP%" to "%DEPLOYMENT_TARGET%" 75 call %KUDU_SYNC_COMMAND% -q -f "%DEPLOYMENT_TEMP%" -t "%DEPLOYMENT_TARGET%" -n "%NEXT_MANIFEST_PATH%" -p "%PREVIOUS_MANIFEST_PATH%" -i ".git;.deployment;deploy.cmd" 2>nul 76 IF !ERRORLEVEL! NEQ 0 goto error 77 78 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 79 80 goto end 81 82 :error 83 echo An error has occured during web site deployment. 84 exit /b 1 85 86 :end 87 echo Finished successfully. 88

This script does a couple of things:

  • Ensure node.js is installed on Windows Azure Web Sites (needed later on for synchronizing files)
  • Setting up a bunch of environment variables
  • Run msbuild on the project file we specified
  • Use kudusync (a node.js based tool, hence node.js) to synchronize modified files to the wwwroot of our site

Try it: after pushing this to Windows Azure Web Sites, you’ll see the custom script being used. Not much added value so far, but that’s what you have to provide.

Unit testing before deploying

Unit tests would be nice! All you need is a couple of unit tests and a test runner. You can add it to your repository and store it there, or simply download it during the deployment. In my example, I’m using the Gallio test runner because it runs almost all test frameworks, but feel free to use the test runner for NUnit or xUnit instead.

Somewhere before the line that invokes msbuild and ideally in the “setup” region of the deployment script, add the following:

1 IF NOT DEFINED GALLIO_COMMAND ( 2 IF NOT EXIST "%appdata%\Gallio\bin\Gallio.Echo.exe" ( 3 :: Downloading unzip 4 echo Downloading unzip 5 curl -O 6 IF !ERRORLEVEL! NEQ 0 goto error 7 8 :: Downloading Gallio 9 echo Downloading Gallio 10 curl -O 11 IF !ERRORLEVEL! NEQ 0 goto error 12 13 :: Extracting Gallio 14 echo Extracting Gallio 15 unzip -q -n -d %appdata%\Gallio 16 IF !ERRORLEVEL! NEQ 0 goto error 17 ) 18 19 :: Set Gallio runner path 20 SET GALLIO_COMMAND=%appdata%\Gallio\bin\Gallio.Echo.exe 21 )

See what happens there?  We check if the local system on which your files are stored in WindowsAzure Web Sites already has a copy of the Gallio.Echo.exetest runner. If not, let’s download a tool which allows us to unzip. Next, the entire Gallio test runner is downloaded and extracted. As a final step, the %GALLIO_COMMAND% variable is populated with the full path to the test runner executable.

Right before the line that calls “kudusync”, add the following:

1 echo Running unit tests 2 "%GALLIO_COMMAND%" "%DEPLOYMENT_SOURCE%\SampleApp.Tests\bin\Release\SampleApp.Tests.dll" 3 IF !ERRORLEVEL! NEQ 0 goto error

Yes, the name of your test assembly will be different, you should obviously change that. What happens here? Well, we’re invoking the test runner on our unit tests. If it fails, we abort deployment. Push it to Windows Azure and see for yourself. Here’s what is displayed on success:

Windows Azure Web Site unit tests

All green! And on failure, we get:

Gallio test runner Windows Azure

In the portal, you can clearly see that deployment was aborted:

Deployment fail when unit tests fail

That’s it. Enjoy!

NuGet Package Source Discovery

It’s already been 2 years since NuGet was introduced. This.NET package manager features the concept of feeds, or “package sources”, on which packages containing .NET libraries and tools can be hosted. In fact, support for feeds inspired us to build While not all people are aware of this, Microsoft started out with two feeds as well: one for, the other one for the Orchard CMS.

More and more feeds are being created daily, both by Microsoft as well as others. Here’s a list of feeds Microsoft has that I know of (there are probably more):

Wouldn’t it be nice if we could add them all to our Visual Studio package sources without having to know these URL’s? Meet the NuGet Package Source Discovery specification, or in short: PSD, a specification Xavier, Scott, PhilJeff, Howard and myself have been working on (thanks guys!)

Package Source Discovery

Because PowerShell says more than words, try the following. Open Visual Studio and open any solution. Then issue the following in the Package Manager Console:

1 Install-Package DiscoverPackageSources 2 Discover-PackageSources -Url ""

While we’re at it, perhaps the Glimpse project has something to discover as well.

1 Discover-PackageSources -Url ""

Close and re-open Visual Studio and check your package sources. Notice anything new? My blog has provided you with 2 feeds. And you’ve also been subscribed to Glimpse’s nightly builds feed.

But there’s more. If you would have been authenticated when connecting to my blog, it will yield API keys as well. This allows the PSD client to setup everything that is needed for me to work with my personal feeds, both consuming and producing, by just remembering the URL of my blog.

Package Source Discovery boils down to trust. Since you apparently trust me, you can discover feeds from my blog. If you trust Microsoft, discover feeds from Do you trust Windows Azure? Get their packages by discovering feeds at Need your company feeds? Discover them at http://nuget. A lot of options and possibilities there!

Recycling standards

If you are a blogger and are using Windows Live Writer, you’ve already used this before. We’ve written the NuGet Package Source Discovery specification based on what happens with blogs: when a simple <link /> element is added to your HTML, you are compatible with feed discovery. Here are the two elements that are listed in the source code for my blog:

1 <link rel="nuget" type="application/atom+xml" title="Maarten Balliauw NuGet feed" href="" /> 2 <link rel="nuget" type="application/rsd+xml" href="" />

The first one points directly to a feed. Using the URL and the title attribute, we can add this one to our NuGet package sources with ease. The second one points to an RSD file, known since ages as the Really Simple Discovery format described on We’ve recycled it to allow a lot of things at the client side. Since not all required metadata can be obtained from the RSD format, the Dublin Core schema is present in the PSD response as well.

Here’s an an example:

1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 2 <rsd version="1.0" xmlns:dc=""> 3 <service> 4 <engineName>MyGet</engineName> 5 <engineLink></engineLink> 6 7 <dc:identifier></dc:identifier> 8 <dc:creator>maartenba</dc:creator> 9 <dc:owner>maartenba</dc:owner> 10 <dc:title>Staging feed for GoogleAnalyticsTracker</dc:title> 11 <dc:description>Staging feed for GoogleAnalyticsTracker</dc:description> 12 <homePageLink></homePageLink> 13 14 <apis> 15 <api name="nuget-v2-packages" preferred="true" apiLink="" blogID="" /> 16 <api name="nuget-v2-push" preferred="true" apiLink="" blogID=""> 17 <settings> 18 <setting name="apiKey">abcdefghijkl</setting> 19 </settings> 20 </api> 21 <api name="nuget-v1-packages" preferred="false" apiLink="" blogID="" /> 22 </apis> 23 </service> 24 </rsd> 25

As you can see, using RSD we can embed a lot more information about a feed in this document. If we wanted to add a link to someone’s GitHub and have a client that wants to use this, we can add another <api /> element in here.

Who is using this?

I am (, Xavier is (, Glimpse is (, NancyFX is ( and MyGet has implemented several endpoints as well. Why don't you join the wonderful world of package source discovery?

Feedback needed!

This is not part of NuGet out of the box yet. We need your feedback, comments, implementations and so on. Head over to our GitHub repository, read through the spec and all examples and provide us with your thoughts. Try the two clients we’ve crafted (more on Xavier's blog) and make your NuGet repositories discoverable. Feel free to post a link to your blog below.

Enjoy and let the commenting begin!